Most churches in Christendom today use mechanical instruments of music, either alone or to accompany their singing in worship to God. In fact, so widespread is the practice that its scripturalness is not generally questioned. Churches which do not employ mechanical instruments in worship are looked upon as being eccentric groups, irregular in doctrine, freakish in custom, and non-conformable to the rules commonly accepted by the majority. Besides comprising a kind of oddity, being abnormal and “out of tune” with the times, they are often accused of being narrow, bigoted, and fanatical.
It seems strange and unorthodox that a minority could be so dogmatic and unreasonable as to find ground for objection to anything so beautiful, innocent, refined, and elevating as an implement that could aid in praising and glorifying God!
May it be said here, however, that this has not always been the case. The position occupied by the majority today has not always been accepted. Present and general acceptance of a principle or a thing does not guarantee its genuineness or authenticity. The Lord once said, “You shall not follow a crowd to do evil” (Exodus 23:2).
Jesus said that the number that will be saved eventually would be relatively small (Matthew 7:13–14). If we were governed by the principle of following the majority, we would all be heathen idolaters!
The most urgently needed lesson of our time is that the only rule for deciding what is right is the word of God. Men must be guided by the standard of the New Testament; perfect and authoritative in all that they believe and practice. It behooves us, therefore, to inquire: “What does the New Testament teach upon
the subject of music in the church?” “Speaking to one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord” (Ephesians 5:19).
“Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom, teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord” (Colossians 3:16). “What is the conclusion then? I will pray with the spirit and I will also sing with the understanding” (I Corinthians 14:15). “I will declare Your name to My brethren, in the midst of the assembly I will sing praise to You” (Hebrews 2:12). See also Matthew 26:30; Acts 16:25; Romans 15:9; James 5:13.
From these passages, it is evident that the Lord authorized singing as the kind of music Christians are to render to Him in worship and in honor of Christ. There are two distinct and separate kinds of music: vocal and instrumental. God specifies the kind we are to render—vocal. And when God specifies a thing in a command, everything else except that thing named is to be excluded. This is a simple principle recognized in other areas by all of us. For example, God commanded Noah to build an ark (Genesis 6:14–22).
Doubtless, there were many kinds of wood which Noah could have used in the ark's construction, but Jehovah specified one particular kind of wood out of which it was to be built—gopher wood. In thus stating definitely the wood which was to be put to this purpose to accomplish the end God intended, every other kind of wood was positively excluded. If Noah had disregarded this divine command, there is no doubt that he would have been lost, along with the whole antediluvian world. But it is very refreshing to read: “Thus Noah did, according to all God commanded him so he did” (Genesis 6:22).
In two of the passages before us, Ephesians 5:19 and Colossians 3:16, not only does He denote and specify the sort of music we are to render—vocal, but He designates the very class of that vocal music—psalms, hymns and spiritual songs.
No other types of songs can we present to God in worship and expect to receive His approval. All other songs, however much we may enjoy and appreciate them, which do not come within this scope, these classification enumerated by Paul, are prohibited. The learning of this simple principle would solve our problems and promote the unity of a divided Christian world.
If the principle and practice of promoting genuine ecumenism (cooperation, understanding, real unity, peace, and harmony) among differing religious faiths is ever to become a reality, we must first learn well the lesson of respect for the authority of God's word. We must speak where the Bible speaks; we must be silent where the Bible is silent. It is permitted for us to do only what is authorized in His word. From everything else we must abstain.
“Whoever transgresses and does not abide in the doctrine of Christ does not have God” (II John 9). There is no more authority in the New Testament for the use of mechanical instrumental music in Christian worship that for the burning of incense, the offering of animal sacrifices, or the observance of Jewish religious days such as the Passover, Pentecost, and the Sabbath.
There are, as one would expect, many arguments offered in favor of the use of mechanical instruments in worship.
1. The Bible does not specifically prohibit its use, we are told. The New Testament is not a catalogue of you shall and you shall not. Rather, principles are laid down by which we are to be governed in our religious activities. “Whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus” (Colossians 3:17). To do anything in the name of Jesus Christ is to do it by His authority; it is to do it by His divine approval and permission.
To assert that God does not say, “You shall not use an instrument in worship,” is begging the question. It assumes that this is proof of the very thing that needs to be proved. If one followed this principle, he could also say that God does not prohibit the observance of Jewish days of worship by saying, “You shall not keep the
Passover, the Pentecost, and the Day of Atonement.” Nor does He say, “You shall not offer animal sacrifices in the worship to God.” On this ground, there is hardly anything one could not do in worship that he should choose to do; and this, you know, would open the floodgate to countless innovations nowhere referred to in the New Testament.
2. The argument is made: “David used instruments of music in worship, and David was a friend of God; so it would be permissible for us today to use them.” It must be remembered that David lived under the Law of Moses, but Christians live under the Law of Christ, the New Testament. “Behold, I have come to do your will, O God. He takes away the first that He may establish the second. By that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all” (Hebrews 10:9–10).
Christ is the mediator of the New Testament (Hebrews 9:15). “For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second. Because finding fault with them, he says, “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah” (Hebrews 8:7–8).
To endeavor to justify a practice on the grounds that David did it, is a very insubstantial and dubious argument. Simply because David did it does not make it right. David had eight wives and took more, with concubines besides (II Samuel 5:13).
David took the wife of another man, committed adultery with her, got him drunk in an effort to deceive him, and finally sent him to the front lines of battle and commanded his own army to retreat so the man might be slain. It is pretty weak to say, “We can do it because David did it.”
It sounds mightily as though David was condemned for the very thing in which so many people want to follow his example. “Woe to you, who are at ease in Zion, and trust in Mount Samaria ... who lie on beds of ivory, stretch out on your couches, eat limbs from the flock and calves from the midst of the stall; who sing idly to the sound of stringed instruments, and invent for yourselves musical instruments like David; but are not grieved for the afflictions of Joseph” (Amos 6:1–6).
It is time for us to learn that David is not the standard nor the authority for worship in the New Testament church.
3. Another postulation advanced in favor of the use of the instrument in worship is that the word psallo—make melody, Ephesians 5:19, permits its use! The claim is even made that the instrument is in the word.
If it were so that the instrument is included in the word, it would be absolutely necessary to use the instrument in order to carry out God's injunction to make melody in this passage. Moreover, it would be imperative for every Christian to play an instrument to please God in worship, for this is a command. But inasmuch as making melody is a command of God to us, how can it be merely permissible? God's commands are not permissible; they are mandatory they are necessary.
When God commands us to do something, it is required that we comply. It is not left to our discretion, or wishes, or volition, as to whether or not we will carry it out. There is no choice in the matter. So, if psallo (making melody) contains the instrument, every Christian is commanded to play an instrument in order to psallo, and there is no alternative. The plain fact is that the instrument is not named or included in the word psallo in the music of the New Testament church.
To verify this statement, your attention is called to the findings of scholars and lexicographers of the New Testament language.
J.W. McGarvey: “No scholar has ever taken the position that the singing of psalms requires the use of a mechanical instrument.”
W.B.F. Treat: “It [psallo] means to pluck or its equivalent; and whether this plucking is of the beard, the hair, the bowstring, the strings of a musical instrument, or something else, must be determined by other words, and not by psallo. It determines nothing as to that, no more than baptizo determines the subject and element of baptism.”
J.S. Dunn: “Can we get instrumental music from this word psallo? It is only ignorance that would lead anyone to think that, as used in the New Testament, this word countenances the use of instruments in Christian worship.”
Thayer: “I will sing God's praises, indeed, with my whole soul stirred and borne away by the Holy Spirit; but I also will follow reason as my guide, so that what I sing may be understood alike by myself and my listeners.“ In defining the word psallo, Thayer says, “In the New Testament it is to sing a hymn, to celebrate the praises of God in song.”
Abbott & Smith: “In the New Testament to sing a hymn, sing praise.” Arndt & Gingrich: “Sing praise in spiritual ecstasy and in full possession of one's mental faculties.” W.E. Vine: “In the New Testament to sing a hymn, sing praises.”
Harper (Analytical Greek Lexicon): “In the New Testament to sing praises.”
Liddell & Scott (Classical Greek Lexicon): “Pluck, pull, twitch, twang. Send a shaft twanging from a bow. A carpenter's red line, which is twitched and suddenly let go, so as to leave a mark.” (It may be noted that Liddell and Scott, being classical lexicographers, do not give the New Testament meaning of the word psallo, but show its original and literal meaning.)
Robinson's Greek Lexicon: “In the New Testament, a psalm, a song in praise of God.” Green's Lexicon: “In the New Testament, to sing praises.” The noun form of the word, psalmos, he defines as a sacred song, psalm.
E.A. Sophocles, who examined all the Greek literature from a period before Christ of 150 years to 1100 years after Christ, did not find the instrument idea in a single passage. The only meaning he found for the word psallo was: “To chant, to sing religious hymns.”
Harper's Latin Lexicon (Psallo, I Corinthians 14:15): “To sing the psalms of David.” The expression in Ephesians 5:19 is “psalming with the heart”—psallontes to kardia. It names the instrument with which we are to make melody and that instrument is the
human heart. Inasmuch as it has been plainly shown what the New Testament teaches on the subject of the use of mechanical instruments in Christian worship, let us examine other great and reputable scholars in their standard works.
1. “There is no warrant in the New Testament for their use.” (No scriptural example for their use; no command to use them; no direction for their use.)
2. “Instruments were not used in the worship of the ancient synagogue.”
3. “The early Reformers, when they came out of Rome, removed them as the monuments of idolatry.”
4. “The instruments of the former economy were ceremonial.”
5. “Instrumental music is incompatible with directions for singing given in the New Testament.”
6. “The greek word psallo is applied among the Greeks of modern times exclusively to sacred music. Which in the Eastern Church has never been any more than vocal, instrumental music being unknown in the primitive church ... but students of ecclesiastical archaeology are generally agreed that instrumental music was not used in the churches till a much later date.”
The American Encyclopedia, Volume XII, page 688: “Pope Vitalian is related to have first introduced organs into some of the churches of Western Europe about 670; but the earliest trustworthy account is that of one sent as a present by the Greek Emperor Constantine Copronymus to Pepin, Kink of Franks in 755.”
Chambers Encyclopedia, Volume VII, page 112: “The organ is said to have been introduced into church music by Pope Vitalian in 666 A.D.”
Catholic Authorities (Music, The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume X, Advent and use of organ: “In Carlovingian times, however, the organ came into use, and was, until the sixteenth century, used solely for the accompaniment of the chant ...”, page 651. (The times referred to here began about 768 with the ascension of Charlemagne, page 349, The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume III.)
The Interpreter's Dictionary Bible: “Explicitly stated here, I Corinthians 13:1, is the primacy of vocal performance over any instrumental music. Implicit is the contempt of all instrumental music, and the emphatic disparagement of gong and cymbals, two of the temple's percussion instruments. Paul however denounced their usage on account of their role in the mystery cults. Paul, himself a Pharisee of the Pharisees' shared fully these views. In all his exhortations, he speaks only of ‘psalms and hymns and spiritual songs’ (Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16).”
“Occasionally Paul even speaks of an instrument, but like the DDS, he uses it only for metaphorical or rhetoric purposes (as trumpet in I Corinthians 14:8). In general, however, he considered all musical instruments lifeless or soulless ... later Christian authorities had more cogent reason for their antagonism against all instrumental music.”
Schaff-Herzog: “... But this argument would prove that it is as much a duty to play as to sing in worship. It is questionable whether, as used in the New Testament, psallo means more than to sing. The absence of instrumental music from the church for some centuries after the apostles and the sentiment regarding it which pervades the writings of the fathers are unaccountable, if in the apostolic church such music was used. In the Greek church the organ never came into use, but after the 8th century it became common in the Latin church, not, however, without question from the side of the monks.”
Fessenden's Encyclopedia: “That instrumental music was not practiced by the primitive Christians, but was an aid to devotion of later times, is evident from church history.
Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, J.N. Brown: ”Musical accompaniments were gradually introduced but can hardly be assigned to a period earlier than the 5th and 6th centuries. Organs were unknown in the church until the 8th or 9th century. Previous to this they had their place in the theater rather than in the church. They were never regarded with favor in the Eastern Church and were vehemently opposed in many places in the West. That Instrumental music was not practiced by primitive Christians, but was an aid to devotion in later times, is evident from church history.
“Mariames Senatus first introduced the organ into the church service in the year 1290. The first we knew of an organ being sent to Pepin by Constantine was about the middle of the 8th century.”
W.D. Killen (The Ancient Church): “It is not, therefore, strange that instrumental music was not heard in the congregational services ... in the early church the whole congregation joined in the singing, but instrumental music did not accompany the praise.” E.S. Lorenz (Church Music): “Singing was little more than a means of expressing in a practicable, social way, the common faith and experience ... the music was purely vocal.
“There was no instrumental accompaniment of any kind ... it fell under the ban of the Christian church, as did all other instruments, because of its pagan association.”
Alfredo Unterseiner (A Short History of Music): “It was exclusively vocal, for the Christian had an aversion to instruments which served at pagan feasts.”
Dr. F.L. Ritter (History of Music From the Christian Era to the Present Time): “Instrumental music was excluded, at first, as having been used by the Romans at their depraved festivities; and everything reminding them of heathen worship would not be endured by the new religionists.”
Edward Dickinson (History of Music): “... while the pagan melodies were always sung to an instrumental accompaniment, the church chant was exclusively vocal.” Frank L. Humphreys (The Evolution of Church Music): “All the music employed in their early services was vocal.”
George P. Fisher (History of the Christian Church): “Church music, which at the onset consisted mainly of singing of psalms, flourished especially in Syria and Alexandria.”
Dr. A.H. Newman (Manual of Church History): “The worship of the early Christians was very free and informal. It consisted of prayer, the singing of psalms, and the reading and exposition of the Old Testament Scriptures [prophesying].”
Philip Schaff (History of the Christian Church, Volume I, page 463): “The Lord Himself inaugurated psalmody into the New Covenant at the institution of the Holy Supper, and Paul expressly enjoined the singing of ‘psalms and hymns and spiritual songs’ as a means of social edification.”
J.L. Mosheim (Ecclesiastical History): “The psalms of David were now received among the public hymns that were sung as a part of the divine service.”
J.W. McGarvey (What Shall We Do About The Organ?): “To sum up these arguments, you can now see that this practice is one of recent origin among Protestant Churches, adopted by them from the Roman apostasy. That it was one of the latest corruptions adopted by that corrupt body; that a large part of the religious world has never accepted it. Though employed in the Jewish ritual, it was deliberately laid aside by the inspired men who organized the church of Christ; and that several precepts of the New Testament implicitly condemn it.”
Layman Coleman, noted Presbyterian author and scholar: “It is generally admitted that primitive Christians employed no instrumental music in their religious worship.”
Charles H. Spurgeon, a Baptist preacher who preached for twenty years in the great Metropolitan Baptist Tabernacle in London, England. Twenty thousand persons heard him every Sunday: “Instruments of music were never used in His tabernacle.”
John Calvin, Founder of Presbyterianism: “Musical instruments in celebrating the praises of God would be no more suitable than the burning of incense, the lighting of lamps, and the restoration of other shadows of the law.”
Adam Clark, Methodist Commentator: “I am an old man, and an old minister; and I here declare that I never knew them [i.e., musical instruments] productive of any good in the worship of God; and have had reason to believe that they were productive of much evil. Music, as a science, I esteem and admire; but instruments of music in the house of God I abominate and abhor.”
Albert Barnes (Ephesians 5:19): “From the beginning, praise was an important part of public worship. The psalms of David were sung by the Jews at the temple, and by early Christians, and singing of those psalms has constituted a delightful part of public worship in all ages. The prevailing character of music in the worship of God should be vocal ... the idea here is, that of singing in the heart, or praising God from the heart.”
William Hendricksen (Ephesians 5:19): “But should edify each other, speaking to one another in Christian song, and doing so from the heart, to the praise and honor of their blessed Lord.”
Pulpit Commentary (Ephesians 5:19): “Some have argued that while adontes denoted singing, psallontes [make melody] means striking the musical instrument. But psallo is so frequently used in a more general sense, that it can hardly be restricted to this meaning here. The great thought is that this musical service must not be musical only, but a service of the heart, the heart must be in a state of worship. In Ephesians 5:19 we read, ‘In your hearts,’ the instrument [here the region] of the song.”
E.F. Bruce: “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, as you teach and admonish one another in all wisdom, and as you sing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs with thanksgiving in your hearts to God.” “The voice must express the praise of the heart if the singing is to be really addressed to God.”
David Lipscomb: “Some claim that psallo carries with it the idea of mechanical instrumental accompaniment, but if the word in the New Testament means to sing with a mechanical instrument, it is not only allowable but obligatory to it.
“The word psallo then would, and did from the beginning embrace the music of the voice as well as that made by stringed instruments of man's invention. The voice is a stringed instrument of God's make. Nor is it singular that as the use of the voice was so much more common and universal than that of any other instrument the word should come to be applied exclusively to the music made by the voice, unless it was specifically said to be by some other instrument. This is what did come to pass. So the word unqualified in the New Testament times came to mean only to sing.”
I have examined about sixty-five translations of the New Testament and their rendering of the word psallo. Out of the more 100 times they translate it, 129 times it is translated sing. Other times it rendered praise or make melody. Only once out of the entire host of scholars is it expressed play harp. This seems weak and insubstantial.
The ground for belief that the New Testament church did not use a mechanical instrument of music to accompany its singing in worship to God is so solid that it is not really disputable. The teaching of the New Testament itself and the almost limitless information from the lexicons, encyclopedias, commentaries, and translations establish the New Testament practice beyond question. All are replete with the evidence that the early Christians, under the supervision of inspired men of God, sang with their hearts as they worshipped.
The subject can be easily and readily resolved today when we decide we shall have utmost respect for the authority of God's word.